Tag Archives: hinkley c

Blowout Week 161

We lead with UK Government moves to reduce or remove renewable subsidies and follow with Scotland still pushing renewables, Brexit to delay Hinkley Point, and the Northern Ireland biomass subsidy fiasco. Then on to the rest of the world – Europe losing its status as a world renewable energy leader, EDF to be compensated for Fessenheim shutdown, Gazprom continues to make European inroads, the precipitous drop in oil & gas discoveries, OPEC’s production cuts aren’t working – or are they? Trump revives the Keystone Pipeline, sets out contradictory coal and gas policies and scares scientists, Rio Tinto sells Australian coal assets, Shell sell North Sea O&G assets, China and Saudi Arabia to build a high-temperature gas-cooled reactor, 100% renewables in Massachusetts, Hawaii and Costa Rica, all trains in the Netherlands are now wind-powered and the latest solution to climate change – floating cities. Continue reading

Posted in Blowout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 97 Comments

The Holy Grail of Battery Storage

A recent Telegraph article claims that storage battery technology is now advancing so fast that “we may never again need to build 20th Century power plants in this country, let alone a nuclear white elephant such as Hinkley Point” and that the “Holy Grail of energy policy” – a storage battery cost of $100/kWh – will be reached in “relatively short order”. This brief post shines the cold light of reality on these claims by calculating battery storage costs based on the storage requirements for specific cases estimated in previous Energy Matters posts. Continue reading

Posted in Energy, Political commentary | Tagged , , , | 120 Comments

The Hinkley Point C Pantomime

The board of EDF, the French State controlled owner of UK and French power stations and vendor of the new Gen 3 EPR (European Pressurised Water Reactor) voted narrowly to approve the Hinkley C reactor project on Thursday (by 10 votes to 7). Contracts were supposed to be signed today (Friday). But then in an unexpected move the UK Government has called the project in for re-evaluation. Clearly, they did not expect the French to proceed. What on Earth is going on? Continue reading

Posted in Energy, Political commentary | Tagged , , , , , | 116 Comments

Blowout Week 132

In 2007, Alex Salmond rejected any new nuclear Scottish power stations. Policies based on fear, rather than facts, may feel good, but they increase the overall risk by not educating the public. Successful democracy requires people understand the decisions they make; otherwise it becomes a loose cannon, with decisions based on slogans. Accidents, when amplified by the media, induce fear far beyond realistic risk. At Fukushima none died from radiation exposure. At Chernobyl only 46 died as a result of radiation damage, an accident caused by faulty safety design and irresponsible neglect of safety procedures. In Hamburg in 2011, 54 died from eating organic beansprouts and 3,500 experienced kidney damage. Continue reading

Posted in Blowout | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 30 Comments

Blowout Week 131

Roger Andrews, a UK national by birth now living in Mexico provides the Energy Matters’ view on Brexit, energy matters, climate change and global politics. 75 years experience analysing complex data impartially does count! Continue reading

Posted in Blowout | Tagged , , , , , , , | 45 Comments